Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 9;70(2):236–239. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.01.010

Table 1.

Analytic performance of rRT-PCR, Luminex xTAG RVP, and BinaxNOW Influenza A & B RIDTa

Influenza A 2009 H1N1 test method Sensitivity Specificity PPVc NPV Prevalence TP TN FP FN
BinaxNOW Influenza A & B RIDT 42.3 (31.4–54.0)b 98.0 (95.7–99.1) 82.5 (66.6–92.1) 88.3 (84.6–91.3) 18.3 (14.8–22.4) 33 341 7 45
LDT SOIA rRT-PCR 98.9 (92.9–99.9) 98.9 (97.0–99.7) 95.6 (88.4–98.6) 99.7 (98.2–100) 19.4 (15.9–23.4) 86 358 4 1
CDC 2009 H1N1 LC480 rRT-PCR 78.2 (67.8–86.0) 99.7 (98.2–100) 98.6 (91.1–99.9) 95.0 (92.2–96.9) 19.4 (15.9–23.5) 68 360 1 19
Luminex xTAG RVP 93.1 (85.0–97.2) 99.5 (97.8–99.9) 97.6 (90.8–99.6) 98.4 (96.3–99.3) 19.4 (15.9–23.5) 81 359 2 6
a

Positivity is defined as requiring 2 or more positive results obtained by rRT-PCR or xTAG RVP.

b

95% Confidence intervals.

c

PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; TP = true positive; TN = true negative; FP = false positive; FN = false negative.