Table 4.26.
Comparative demographic and disease-related characteristics of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and cases with a progressive initial course, among 1844 patients with multiple sclerosis from the Lyon, France, multiple sclerosis cohort.
| Secondary progressive multiple sclerosisa (n = 496) | multiple sclerosis with a progressive initial courseb (n = 282) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (%) | |||
| Males | 39 | 43 | 0.32* |
| Females | 61 | 57 | |
| Age at onset of the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (years) | |||
| Mean ± standard deviation | 39.5 ± 10.3 | 39.4 ± 11.3 | 0.47** |
| Median | 39.1 | 40.1 | |
| Initial symptoms of the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (%) | |||
| Isolated optic neuritis | 0 | 2 | 0.11* |
| Isolated brainstem dysfunction | 0 | 0 | |
| Isolated dysfunction of long tracts | 85 | 84 | |
| Combination of symptoms | 15 | 14 | |
| Superimposed relapses during the progressive phase (%) | |||
| Yes | 40 | 39 | 0.81* |
| No | 60 | 61 | |
| Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time (median in years) | |||
| from onset of multiple sclerosis to assignment of | |||
| DSS 4 | 6.1 | 0.0 | <0.001** |
| DSS 6 | 12.5 | 7.1 | <0.001** |
| DSS 7 | 19.1 | 13.4 | <0.001** |
| From assignment of a disability status score of 4 to | |||
| DSS 6 | 4.0 | 5.4 | 0.001** |
| DSS 7 | 9.0 | 12.0 | <0.001** |
| From assignment of a disability status score of 6 to | |||
| DSS 7 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.09** |
| Kaplan–Meier estimates of the age (median in years) at the time of assigning a disability status score of | |||
| DSS 4 | 37.6 | 42.1 | <0.001** |
| DSS 6 | 45.5 | 53.0 | <0.001** |
| DSS 7 | 53.3 | 63.1 | <0.001** |
| Duration of multiple sclerosis (years) | |||
| Mean ± standard deviation | 17.6 ± 9.6 | 10.1 ± 8.0 | <0.001*** |
p values are calculated with use of the chi-squared test (*), the log rank test (**), or Student's t test (***).
DSS = Kurtzke Disability Status Scale.
Defined according to theLublin and Reingold (1996)classification.
Denotes the pooling of cases with ‘progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis' and of cases with ‘primary progressive multiple sclerosis' (Lublin and Reingold 1996).
Adapted from Confavreux et al (2000) and Confavreux et al (2005b)
© 2006