Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2006 Jul 25;40(6):1405–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.025

Table 1.

Results for chondron modulus, PCM modulus, effective strain relative to far field strain, and comparisons with effective strain values using properties obtained from microaspiration

vPCM = 0.04 vPCM = 0.4
Min Mean Max Min Mean Max
Echondron (kPa)a 65 126 187 65 126 187
EPCM (kPa)b 0.04 43 150 82 240 400
ε˜cell/ε˜ECMc 0.09 2.11 1.82 1.79 1.65 1.48
% Differenced −95 + 0.5 −13 −15 −21 −30
a

From seeded agarose construct (Kelly et al., 2004).

b

Determined by the present method.

c

Average cell strain relative to far-field tissue strain from FEA.

d

Difference in relative cell strains using the PCM modulus determined with the present method and a cell modulus of 3.4 kPa (Knight et al., 2002) versus cell (Guilak et al., 1999; Jones et al., 1999) and PCM (Guilak et al., 1999) properties determined using micro-aspiration.