Iori 2011.
| Methods | RCT; randomisation and allocation procedures not described | |
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | I: open wedge HTO with a navigation system (n = 13; 14 knees) C: open wedge HTO without navigation system (n = 11; 13 knees) |
|
| Outcomes | Alignment (HKA angle), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), tibial slope (Brazier methods), patellar height (Insall‐Salvati Index), inferior limb length, American KSS, Modified Cincinnati Rating System Questionnaire, VAS (pain: 0 = unbearable pain and 10 = no pain) | |
| Notes | Quote: "The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with this study" | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "All the radiological evaluations were performed by a single blinded expert radiologist" |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No dropouts mentioned |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes presented |
| Other bias | Low risk | No issue |