Ahmed 2004.
Methods | RCT. Individual women. 2‐arm study. | |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention: cephalosporin (B3).
Comparison: penicillin (A4) combination.
|
|
Outcomes | Post‐operative febrile morbidity; post‐operative infection; endometritis; wound infection; pelvic abscess; peritonitis; other febrile morbidity. | |
Notes |
Dates: January to June 2001 Setting: Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Central Sudan. Subgroups
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “...were randomised...” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “...were randomised...” |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded and the drug regimens were different, one a single dose, the other 3 doses. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not assess trial protocol. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No statistical differences in admission variables between the two groups. Data and P values provided on temperature, weight, gestational age, pre‐operative Hb. However, other aspects of bias unclear. · "The drugs were donated by Alhikma Company, Wad Medani, Sudan." but it seems unclear whether this might give the company any influence or not. |