Busowski 2000.
Methods | RCT. Individual women. 3‐arm study. | |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention: cephalosporin (B2).
Comparison 1: penicillin (A4) combination
Comparison 2
|
|
Outcomes | Endometritis; pneumonia; bacteraemia; UTI; would infection; postpartum stay > 6 days. | |
Notes |
Setting: Tampa General Hospital, US. Subgroups
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “... prospectively randomised...” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “... prospectively randomised...” |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | · “Investigators were blinded to treatment.” |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | · “Investigators were blinded to treatment.” |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not asses trial protocol. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Baseline characteristics similar for: primaparous; weight; gestation; race; repeat CS; Hb but there was a statistically significant difference in age considered not to be clinically important. Other aspects of bias were unclear. No information about funding source of study. |