Lehapa 1999.
| Methods | RCT. Individual women. 2‐arm study. | |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
| Interventions |
Intervention: cephalosporin (B3).
Comparison: penicillin (A4).
|
|
| Outcomes | Abdominal and/or wound sepsis; febrile morbidity; hospital stay; antibiotic and consumable costs. | |
| Notes |
Setting: Ga‐Rankuwa Hospital, South Africa. Subgroups
Conference abstract only. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind study. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind study although it is unclear whether assessors might have known allocation of not. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | None reported, but there is no information on the denominators in either group for us to be sure there was no loss of participants. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not assess trial protocol. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Two groups reported as similar in baseline characteristics on: age; gestation; type of incision; length of surgery, but no data provided. Other aspects of potential bias were unclear. No information about funding source of study. |