Mothilal 2013.
| Methods | A randomised prospective study with two parallel arms. Women randomised individually. | |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
| Interventions |
Intervention: macrolide (E).
Comparison: cephalosporin (B1).
|
|
| Outcomes | Reported outcomes: post‐operative fever, wound healing duration (healing within 10 days, healing within 20 days), pain for 6 days, pain for 7‐9 days, infection, PV discharge. | |
| Notes |
Study dates: September 2011 to February 2012. Follow‐up of the cases were finished in March 2012. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, SRM Medical Research Centre and Hospital in Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram District, India. Subgroups
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “The pregnant women were randomly given either Azithromycin or cefazolinas prophylactic antibiotics” and "(Antibiotics) were given ... in a random order ...”. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "The pregnant women were randomly given either Azithromycin or Cefazolinas prophylactic antibiotics". |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information on this. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information on this. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses of follow‐up were reported. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The study protocol is not available. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Not known. No information about funding source of study. |