Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 17;2014(11):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub2

Noyes 1998.

Methods RCT. Individual women. 3‐arm study.
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • Women undergoing CS.

  • Gravid women in labour or having had rupture of membranes for 6 hours.

  • N = 300, but analysis on 292.


Exclusion criteria
  • < 18 years of age, known allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotics, antibiotic therapy within 72 hours prior to hospital admission, history of group B streptococcal infection, prophylactic antibiotic therapy for underlying medical illness or enhancement of fetal lung maturity, or clinical evidence of chorioamnionitis at the time of CS.

Interventions Intervention 1: cephalosporin (B1).
  • Cefazolin.

  • 1 g, IV, single dose.

  • N = 98.


Intervention 2: cephalosporin (B2).
  • Cefotetan.

  • 1 g, IV, single dose.

  • N = 99.


Comparison: penicillin (A4) combination.
  • Ampicillin + sulbactam.

  • 1.5 g, IV, single dose.

  • N = 95.

Outcomes Endometritis.
Notes Dates: July 1988 to November 1990.
Setting: New York Hospital, university‐based, US.
Subgroups
  1. Non‐elective CS.

  2. After cord clamping.

  3. IV administration.

  4. Single dose.

  • Comparison: 1 (subgroup 2); 2; 3; 4; 6; 8.

  • No information about funding source of study.

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk “Prospective randomized trial”.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 8 out of 300 women (2.7%) were excluded from the analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk We did not assess the trial protocol.
Other bias Unclear risk There was insufficient information to assess other possible biases. No information about funding source of study.