Rehu 1980.
| Methods | RCT. Individual women. 4 groups. | |
| Participants |
Inclusion
Exclusion
|
|
| Interventions |
Intervention 1: penicillin (A1).
Intervention 2: lincosamide antibiotic (H) + aminoglycoside (G).
Comparison 1: placebo 1 (not included in this review).
Comparison 2: placebo 2 (not included in this review).
|
|
| Outcomes | Endometritis; wound infection; duration of hospital stay; number of women receiving post‐operative treatment. | |
| Notes |
Dates: September 1977 and January 1978. Setting: State/maternity hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Subgroups
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "...assigned at random...". |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Antibiotic preparations for intravenous use were supplied in solution in bottles carrying code numbers. Still unclear if there was allocation concealment. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The code was kept secret for persons performing the operations and observing the patients in the postoperative period." |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The code was kept secret for persons performing the operations and observing the patients in the postoperative period". |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Two out of the 147 women receiving antibiotics of other reasons during the preoperative period were later excluded from the series. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not assess the trial protocol. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | There was no information on baseline characteristics of the women in the groups, and other possible biases were unclear. No information about funding source of study. |