Skip to main content
. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD008554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008554.pub3

Zanette 2008.

Methods Prospective RCT
2 weeks treatment and 2 weeks follow‐up
Participants 10 patients with probable or definite ALS were enrolled. 5 participants in active stimulation group and 5 participants in sham stimulation group
Age: 43 to 72 years
Men: 7
Women: 3
Disease duration: 7 to 18 months
Interventions Experimental group: for upper‐limb cortical areas on both sides, a Super Rapid magnetic stimulator (The Magstim Co., UK) connected to a figure‐of‐eight focal coil was performed (5Hz, 20 trains of 15 stimuli, 60 s interval between trains; 110% resting motor threshold). rTMS was delivered for 5 consecutive days per week for 2 weeks
Control group: performed using the same stimulator connected to a specific sham coil that have no stimulating effect on the cortex but produces similar auditory and scalp sensations as the active coil treatment with manipulation, which delivered 5 consecutive days per week for 2 weeks
All participants were taking riluzole
Outcomes Changes in ALSFRS‐R scores, muscle strength and fatigue 2 weeks after the end of rTMS
Notes It was a single centre trial carried out in Italy
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "a randomised trial on a group of ALS patients", the detailed method was not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "a randomised trial on a group of ALS patients", the detailed method was not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Identical stimulator used for the real rTMS and placebo rTMS, to ensure participants and the neurologists administering the intervention were unaware of the study group
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The study report does not state whether investigators were blinded to treatment assignment until completion of the final analyses.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Four weeks assessments were available for all randomised participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified outcomes were reported in the results section of the manuscript
Other bias Low risk There were no other concerns regarding the risk of bias in this study

ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS‐R: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale‐Revised; BDNF: brain derived neurotrophic factor; RCT: randomised controlled trial; rTMS: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.