Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 6;2015(3):CD003443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003443.pub3

Comparison 30. PERPHENAZINE vs TRIFLUOPROMAZINE.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Leaving the study early: 1. Any reason 3 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.66, 1.98]
1.1 short term 3 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.66, 1.98]
2 Leaving the study early: 2. Due to adverse events 2 168 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.00 [0.74, 5.39]
2.1 short term 2 168 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.00 [0.74, 5.39]
3 Global state: 1. Change over time ‐ no better or deterioration (ITT) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 short term 1 62 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.25, 2.01]
4 Adverse events: Movement disorders 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 akathisia ‐ short term 1 106 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 7.0 [0.89, 54.94]
4.2 akinesia ‐ short term 1 106 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.3 dyskinesia ‐ short term 1 106 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 5.0 [0.25, 101.73]
4.4 parkinsonism ‐ short term 1 106 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 17.0 [1.01, 287.24]
5 Other adverse events: 1. Central nervous system 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 electroencephalogram (increase) ‐ short term 1 10 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.08, 11.93]