Wang 2008a.
Methods | Allocation: randomised. Blindness: no details. Duration: 8 weeks. Setting: not stated. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). N = 64. Age: risperidone: 65±2 years; perphenazine: 64 ± 3 years. Sex: F29, M35 (risperidone: M18, F16; perphenazine: M17, F13) History: length of illness: risperidone: 0.9 ± 1.4; perphenazine: 1.2 ± 1.4 years. Included: schizophrenia; age > 60; no history of taking antipsychotic drugs; PANNS > 60. Excluded: severe physical disease; drug abuse. Consent: not stated. |
|
Interventions | 1. Perphenazine: start dose 2‐4mg/d, maximum dose 30mg/d, 23.5 ± 1.3mg/d, n = 30. 2. Risperidone: 5mg tablet, start dose 0.25‐0.5mg/d, maximum dose 3.5mg/d, 2.2 ± 1.2mg/d, n = 34. No other combinations permitted. |
|
Outcomes | PANSS (marked improvement => 60 reduction; improved => 40%; no effect =< 40%). TESS ‐ adverse effects. Unable to use ‐ PANSS score – no means/ SD. TESS scores – no means/ SD. Not all adverse events reported by group. |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | ‘Randomised’ – no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No description. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not all outcome measures reported; adverse events not reported fully by group. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | As above. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No details of funding/ who administered rating scales. |