Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 6;2015(3):CD003443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003443.pub3

Wang 2008b.

Methods Allocation: randomised.
Blindness: not reported.
Duration: 6 weeks (2007‐2008).
Setting: Shandong Center for Mental Health, Jinan, China.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia DSM‐IV.
N = 60.
Age: Olanzapine: 33.1±7.6 years; perphenazine: 31.2±3.2 years.
Sex: F26, M34 (Olanzapine F12, M18; perphenazine F14, M16).
History: length of illness olanzapine: 78.5 ± 6.8 months; perphenazine: 79.6 ± 9.5 months.
Included: schizophrenia combined with positive symptoms; PANSS≥ 70, Positive score ≥ 25.
Exclusion: not reported.
Consent: not stated.
Interventions 1. Perphenazine: start from 8 mg/day, maximum dosage: 60 mg/day, n =30.
2. Olanzapine (Changzhou Watson Pharmacy Ltd.): start from 5 mg/day, maximum dosage: 20 mg/day, n = 30.
Outcomes PANSS score.
TESS score.
Clinical prognosis assessment: decreased rate of PANSS score = (pre‐treatment score‐post‐treatment score)/pre‐treatment score ≥ 75%‐‐recovery; 50%‐ to ‐74% markedly improved; 25% to 49% improved; < 25% no effect.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised – no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No description.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None detected.
Other bias Unclear risk Funding: not stated.
Rating scales: raters not stated to be independent of treatment.