Wang 2008b.
Methods | Allocation: randomised. Blindness: not reported. Duration: 6 weeks (2007‐2008). Setting: Shandong Center for Mental Health, Jinan, China. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia DSM‐IV. N = 60. Age: Olanzapine: 33.1±7.6 years; perphenazine: 31.2±3.2 years. Sex: F26, M34 (Olanzapine F12, M18; perphenazine F14, M16). History: length of illness olanzapine: 78.5 ± 6.8 months; perphenazine: 79.6 ± 9.5 months. Included: schizophrenia combined with positive symptoms; PANSS≥ 70, Positive score ≥ 25. Exclusion: not reported. Consent: not stated. |
|
Interventions | 1. Perphenazine: start from 8 mg/day, maximum dosage: 60 mg/day, n =30. 2. Olanzapine (Changzhou Watson Pharmacy Ltd.): start from 5 mg/day, maximum dosage: 20 mg/day, n = 30. |
|
Outcomes | PANSS score. TESS score. Clinical prognosis assessment: decreased rate of PANSS score = (pre‐treatment score‐post‐treatment score)/pre‐treatment score ≥ 75%‐‐recovery; 50%‐ to ‐74% markedly improved; 25% to 49% improved; < 25% no effect. |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised – no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No description. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | None detected. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Funding: not stated. Rating scales: raters not stated to be independent of treatment. |