Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 6;2015(3):CD003443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003443.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Affleck 1969 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. penicillamine, perphenazine and a placebo vs. penicillamine, penicillamine vs. placebo.
Ahlfors 1980 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. clopenthixol decanoate.
Akimoto 1966 Allocation: 'randomly selected'
Participants: schizophrenia
Intervention: perphenazine vs chlorpromazine vs levomepromazine vs prochlorperazine (not parallel‐arm study, no control group, all participants received all drugs over one year)
Angst 1975 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. fluphenazine decanoate vs. flusipirilene vs. penfluridol vs. pipothiazine palmitate.
Anonymous 1966 Allocation: not randomised.
Asada 1976 Allocation: not randomised ‐ matched pairs.
Bakke 1973 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. fluphenazine enanthate.
Bandelow 1992 Allocation: random
Participants: people with schizophrenia
Interventions: perphenazine enanthate versus perazine versus fluphenazine versus levomepromazine versus thioridazine versus clozapine versus haloperidol decanoate versus fluphenazine decanoate versus flupenthixol decanoate versus fluspirilene
Becker 1970 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with chronic schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine and amitriptyline vs. perphenazine and placebo.
Bjerkelund 1965 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with acute myocardial infarct.
Böhlau 1985 Allocation: unclear, open multi‐centre study. 
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with dementia.
Cannistra 1959 Allocation: unclear, double‐blind prospective study. 
 Participants: obstetric patients.
Ceskova 1994 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. risperidone.
 Data about separate phases not available.
Ceskova 1996 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. haloperidol.
 Data about separate phases not available.
Clarke 1981 Allocation: not randomised, open clinical trial.
Cohen 1958 Allocation: not randomised, open clinical trial.
Cooper 1979 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. amitriptyline vs. perphenazine and amitriptyline.
Den Boer 2000 Allocation: not randomised.
Dencker 1994 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine decanoate vs. haloperidol decanoate.
Eklund 1976 Allocation: not random
Erb 1982 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: healthy normal males.
Eufe 1979 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. flupentixol enanthate.
Fahn 1964 Allocation: unclear, double‐blind prospective study. 
 Participants: those with choreic movements.
Farzin 2005 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Interventions: perphenazine + famotidine versus perphenazine + placebo
Fitzgerald 1969 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double ‐ identical ampoules.
 Participants: those with acute psychiatric episodes.
Galdi 1988 Allocation: random
Participants: people with schizophrenia or depression
Intervention: perphenazine vs chlorpromazine vs fluphenazine
Outcomes: no usable data
Gerlach 1977 Allocation: not randomised.
Gerlach 1988 Allcation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with tardive dyskinesia.
Gerson 1964 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness. double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine or chlorpromazine or trifluoperazine or prochlorperazine or methaminodiazepoxide or fluphenazine or phenelzine or imipramine tranylcypromine vs. 4‐(3, 4‐dimethoxyphenetyl)‐2, 6‐piperazinedione and 2‐methyl‐3‐orthotolyl‐4‐quinazinolone.
Gianelli 1990 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. fluphenazine decanoate vs. haloperidol decanoate.
Hadlik 1970 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. thiothixem.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Hanlon 1966 Allocation: random
Participants: 'acutely disturbed psychiatric patients'
Intervention: perphenazine vs perphenazine‐benztropine mesylate
Hansen 1979 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those being on neuroleptic therapy.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. perphenazine and biperidine vs. perphenazine and orphenadrine.
Haran 1960 Allocation: not randomised.
Holden 1969 Allocation: not randomised ‐ matched groups.
Hollister 1967 II Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with depression as predominant psychiatric symptom.
Hollister 1974 Allocation: not randomised.
Huang 1964 Allocation: not randomised.
Jprn 2011 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Intervention: algorithm‐guided treatment (different antipsychotic drugs: perphenazine, aripiprazole, olanzapine, blonanserine, perospiron, quetiapine, risperidone, haloperidol) versus treatment as usual
Kaim 1972 Allocation: unclear, double‐blind prospective study. 
 Participants: those with delirium tremens.
Kaji 1974 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine and levomepromazine vs. clocapramine and levomepromazine.
Kawakita 1965 Allocation: not randomised.
Kistrup 1991 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine decanoate vs. cis(z)‐flupentixol decanoate.
Kline 1968 Allocation: not randomised.
Knudsen 1985 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine decanoate vs. perphenazine enanthate.
Knudsen 1985a Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Interventions: perphenazine decanoate vs perphenazine enanthate
Kothari 1960 Allocation: not randomised.
Lapolla 1967 Allocation: not randomised.
Levine 1997 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. chlorpromazine vs. placebo.
 Contacted on March 12th: data about methods no more available.
Lindholm 1978 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. perphenazine enanthate.
Linnoila1982 Allocation: unclear.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with depression.
Loprete 1967 Allocation: serial placement.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia and anxiousness and depression.
 Interventions: perphenazine and amitriptyline (Etrafon) vs. perphenazine and amitriptyline (Etrafon forte) vs. non barbiturate hypnotic sedative (Dormison) vs. phenobarbital vs. placebo.
Mason‐Browne 1957 Allocation: not randomised ‐ matched groups.
Mazurek 2003 Allocation: random
Participants: paranoid schizophrenia (ICD‐10‐R)
Intervention: typical antipsychotic drugs (haloperidol, levomepromazine, perazine, perphenazine, zuclopenthixol) versus atypical (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine) ‐ not separated by drug
Moore 1958 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with an anaesthetic for operation.
Müller 1994 Allocation: open, randomised, three‐way cross‐over, single‐dose design.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: healthy volunteers.
Nahunek 1967 Allocation: open cross‐over design ‐ not randomised.
Nahunek 1968 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia or endogenous depression.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. octoclothepin.
Nahunek 1969 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. triperidol.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Nahunek 1970 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. triperidol.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Nahunek 1970 II Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. flupenthixol.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Nahunek 1975 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. clozapin.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Nahunek 1976 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. clozapin vs. levopromazin vs. thioridazin vs. chlorpromazin vs. flupenthixol vs. methophenazin vs. oxypertin vs. clothiapin vs. pimozid vs. methylperidol vs. triperidol vs. oxyprothepin vs. octoclothepin vs. thiothixen.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Nahunek 1980 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. perphenazine.
Nordic DS Group 1986 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with tardive dyskinesia.
O'Reilly 1957 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia and two epileptics.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. chlorpromazine or placebo (variable).
Oltman 1966 Allocation: not randomised.
Omerov 1989 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. perphenazine.
Opjordsmoen 2000 Allocation: not random
Pfeiffer 1965 Allocation: not randomised.
Prien 1973 Allocation: not randomised.
Prusoff 1979 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with depressive schizophrenia.
 Interventions: amitriptyline and perphenazine vs. placebo.
Rapp 1972 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. fluphenazine decanoate.
Rapp 1986 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. haloperidol decanoate.
Rappaport 1967 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. placebo.
 Outcomes: intelligibility score.
Rappaport 1968 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. placebo.
 Outcomes: intelligibility score.
Reznik 2000 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. perphenazine and fluvoxamine.
Rickels 1982 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with depression.
Ritter 1971 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with acute withdrawal syndrome.
Rodova 1971 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. clothiapin.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Rodova 1973 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. clozapine.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Scurr 1958 Allocation: unclear.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with an operation.
Shalev 1993 contacted on March 12th: data about methods no more available.
Sharpley 1964 Allocation: not random (controlled)
Shiloh 2002 Allocation: random
Participants: treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Intervention: mianserin versus placebo (in conjunction with haloperidol or perphenazine)
Silver 2000 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: antipsychotic drug and fluvoxamine vs. antipsychotic drug and placebo.
Simopoulos 1971 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: dilantin vs. dilantin and thorazine vs. dilantin and thioridazine vs. dilantin and perphenazine.
Simpson 1970 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. perphenazine‐amitriptyline.
Smith 1959 Allocation: not randomised.
Spiker 1985 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with delusional depression.
Sun 2010 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Intervention: venlafaxine extended release tablets + perphenazine versus perphenazine + placebo
Sun 2010b Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Intervention: aripiprazole + placebo vs aripiprazole + perphenazine
Svestka 1970 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. methylperidol.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Svestka 1972 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. pimozide.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Svestka 1973 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. oxyprothepine.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Svestka 1974 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. oxypertine.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Svestka 1975 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. trifluoperazine.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Svestka 1989 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. isofloxythepin.
Svestka 1989a Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. carbamazepine.
Svestka 1990 Allocation: randomised ‐ cross‐over design.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine vs. sulpiride.
 Data about separate phases no more available.
Syvalahti 1997 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: placebo or citalopram vs. perphenazine or haloperidol or chlorpromazine.
Tegeler 1979 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: perphenazine enanthate vs. flusipirilene.
Wang 2001 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia (ICD‐10 and CCMD‐2‐R)
Intervention: perphenazine versus 1‐stepholidine (traditional Chinese medicine)
Whittaker 1963 Allocation: "open cross‐over" ‐ not randomised.
Wolf 2007 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Intervention: aripiprazole versus 'another antipsychotic' ‐ not reported by drug‐group
Yagi 1976 Allocation: randomised.
 Blindness: double.
 Participants: those with schizophrenia.
 Interventions: carpipramine and chlorpromazine vs. perphenazine and chlorpromazine vs. placebo and chlorpromazine.
Zhong 2001 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia (ICD‐10 and CCMD‐2‐R)
Intervention: perphenazine versus 1‐stepholidine (Chinese herbal medicine)
Zhu 2009 Allocation: random
Participants: schizophrenia
Intervention: psychological care + perphenazine versus perphenazine alone

Diagnostic tools: 
 CCMD‐2‐R – Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders, Second Edition, Revised
 ICD‐10‐R ‐ International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision