Mathias 2012.
| Methods | Country: USA Setting: Chicago, Illinois Design: before and after study involving cohort and cross sectional smokers. |
|
| Participants | Single urban primary care practice; 37 attending and 78 resident physicians. 1,349 documented smokers in preintervention cohort, 1,346 in postintervention cohort. 764 included in both cohorts | |
| Interventions | A smoking cessation alert was added to the EHR. The alert prompted physician actions including a medication order set. | |
| Outcomes | Change in orders of prescription for cessation medications; change in referral to cessation counselling. | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | No control group |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | As above |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Personnel not blind to change in EHR, risk of bias judged low |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Objective data extracted from EHR, although assessors not blind to whether pre‐ or post‐intervention |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Same methods of data extraction pre and postintervention |