Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;2014(12):CD008743. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008743.pub3

Mathias 2012.

Methods Country: USA
Setting: Chicago, Illinois
Design: before and after study involving cohort and cross sectional smokers.
Participants Single urban primary care practice; 37 attending and 78 resident physicians. 1,349 documented smokers in preintervention cohort, 1,346 in postintervention cohort. 764 included in both cohorts
Interventions A smoking cessation alert was added to the EHR. The alert prompted physician actions including a medication order set.
Outcomes Change in orders of prescription for cessation medications; change in referral to cessation counselling.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk No control group
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk As above
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Personnel not blind to change in EHR, risk of bias judged low
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Objective data extracted from EHR, although assessors not blind to whether pre‐ or post‐intervention
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Same methods of data extraction pre and postintervention