Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 12;2014(8):CD008602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008602.pub3

Siddiqui 2007.

Methods RCT. Two‐arm parallel‐group design
Participants 60 patients who presented to a single centre (number of CTEV feet unknown)
Inclusion criteria: CTEV with Dimeglio grade I and II undergoing surgical correction
Exclusion criteria: CTEV with Dimeglio grade III and IV
PARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS
Age range in months: 6 to 18
Sex male (%): 61.7%
Basline severity: Dimeglio grade I, 20 participants; Dimeglio grade II, 40 participants
Window procedure
Age mean: 9.5 months
Characteristics of feet: 30 participants (bilateral and unilateral numbers not reported)
Baseline severity: not stated
Turco procedure
Age mean: 9.6 months
Characteristics of feet: 30 participants (bilateral and unilateral numbers not reported)
Baseline severity: not stated
Interventions Window procedure versus Turco procedure for treatment of CTEV
Participants were randomised equally into both groups
The Window procedure was not described in detail in the article. It utilises five or six small incisions rather than a long posteromedial incision. Postoperatively the foot is placed in a plaster in the corrected position. Details of the plaster were not provided
In the Turco group, postoperatively a cast was not applied for 15 days because of oedema
Follow‐up: not stated
Outcomes Dimeglio scale
Postoperative assessment criteria according to Beatson 6 months after surgery
Time in theatre
Adverse events
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Unable to blind intervention provider. Assessor blinding not reported. Participant blinding unlikely to affect outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Follow‐up time not reported
Other bias High risk Procedure was developed, used and assessed by the same team within the same population. Bilateral and unilateral numbers not reported. Follow‐up times not reported