Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 23;2014(6):CD008579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008579.pub3

Comparison 2. ECSW versus control.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Non‐union at 12 months follow‐up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 As reported analysis 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Sensitivity analysis 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Pain at 3 months (VAS: 0 no pain to 10 severe pain) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 As reported analysis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Worst case analysis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]