Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;2020(4):CD003769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003769.pub5

1. Overview of treatment characteristics of the included herniorrhaphy studies.

  Antibiotic Dose (g) Administration route Follow‐up period Operative time (minutes); (mean ± SD or median (range)) Infection risk environment
(Infection percentage in control group)
Remark
Andersen 1980 AMP 1 in fascia 1 m, 3 m, 6 m, 12 m not reported Low (4.0%) Several surgery types performed
Evans 1973 CLR 1 (3×) intravenous (1x)/ intramuscular (2x) 1 m not reported Low (4.1%) Several surgery types performed
Lazorthes 1992 CAM 0.75 subcutaneous (added to local anaesthesia) 1 m not reported Low (4.6%)  
Platt 1990 CON 1 intravenous 1 w, 4 to 6 w PG: 75 ± 32 / CG: 75 ± 30 Low (1.9%) Several surgery types performed
Taylor 1997 AMC 1.2 intravenous 4 to 6 w not reported High (8.9%)  

PG = prophylactic group, CG = control group

AMC = Amoxicillin‐clavoulanic acid, AMP = ampicillin, CAM = cefamandole, CON = cefonicid, CLR = cephaloridine (Abbreviations according to EUCAST System for Antimicrobial Abbreviations)

w = week, m = month, y = year

Infection risk environment (L = low; ≤ 5% infections in control group for all wound infections (SSSI + DSSI), H = high; > 5% infections in control group for all wound infections (SSSI + DSSI) ).