Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 25;2016(4):CD003455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003455.pub2

Comparison 3. Endoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation versus heater probe.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Severe bleeding episodes 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Mean number of severe bleeds after first year 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Mean haematocrit after first year 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Mean units of blood transfused after first year 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected