Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;2020(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3

Comparison 11. Mepacrine.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pleurodesis failure rate 5   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Mepacrine vs talc slurry 1 89 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.08 [0.62, 6.96]
1.2 Mepacrine vs bleomycin 1 36 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.16 [0.03, 0.89]
1.3 Mepacrine vs tetracycline 1 21 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.05, 8.20]
1.4 Mepacrine vs placebo 1 23 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.07 [0.01, 0.73]
1.5 Mepacrine vs mitoxantrone 1 26 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 7.61 [0.35, 163.82]
1.6 Mepacrine vs triethylene... 1 29 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.04, 0.98]
2 Fever 3   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Mepacrine vs bleomycin 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.91 [0.52, 7.01]
2.2 Mepacrine vs tetracycline 1 22 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 8.00 [1.13, 56.79]
2.3 Mepacrine vs placebo 1 23 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 62.43 [2.85, 1365.52]
2.4 Mepacrine vs triethylene... 1 29 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 23.83 [3.35, 169.39]
3 Pain 3 114 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.56 [1.66, 12.52]
3.1 Mepacrine vs bleomycin 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.15 [0.52, 9.00]
3.2 Mepacrine vs tetracycline 1 22 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 5.6 [0.81, 38.51]
3.3 Mepacrine vs placebo 1 23 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 14.53 [0.71, 298.21]
3.4 Mepacrine vs triethylenethiophosphoramide 1 29 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 23.71 [1.19, 474.06]
4 Mortality 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Mepacrine vs talc slurry 1 89 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.53 [0.20, 1.43]
4.2 Mepacrine vs mitoxantrone 1 28 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.64 [0.23, 11.70]