Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431.pub3

Mentes 2001.

Methods RTC n=111
Participants CAF
Interventions Botox 0.3u/kg vs. LIS 
 n = 111
Outcomes Healing 
 Incontinence
Notes 6 m0 f/u0 drop outs, but 6 cross over to LIS at 2 mo. 
 RNS 
 ITT +
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk RNS
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk D ‐ Not used
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk appropriate outcomes/side effects reported
Other bias Low risk ITT+, 0 drop outs,
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Duration of Follow‐up 6 months or more Low risk 6 months