Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431.pub3

Suknaic 2008.

Methods RCT n=50
Participants CAF adults and children
Interventions Botox 10u vs LIS
Outcomes Healing
Minor incontinence
Notes AS inadequate, AC no, B no, SS not stated
R ‐ no (first 30 patients in one arm, second 30 in second arm)
ITT+
Drop‐outs 10
Follow‐up 6 months
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Inadequate randomisation process.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk not concealed
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded due to injection vs surgery
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk appropriate outcomes/side effects reported
Other bias High risk >10% drop outs,
Duration of Follow‐up 6 months or more Low risk 6 months