Müller‐Rath 2011.
| Methods | RCT; randomisation procedure and blinding of outcome assessment not described | |
| Participants | Symptomatic varus knee OA: n = 33 Male/female: 24/9 Mean age (years): 53 Mean BMI (kg/m2): 27.2 | |
| Interventions | I = valgus knee brace or elastic knee bandage vs C = no treatment Follow‐up: 16 weeks |
|
| Outcomes | Tegner, Insall, Lequesne, WOMAC, HSS, VAS | |
| Notes | Number of participants lost to follow‐up is not reported. Study is funded by Medi, provider of orthoses. Study authors could not provide their data because of a "server breakdown" | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No lost participants were reported; study authors could not provide their data because of a "server breakdown" |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No intention‐to‐treat |