Skip to main content
. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2
Comparison Outcome Subgroup Effect size (SMD) No. of studies (N) Fail‐safe‐n
1. FNB vs PCA opioid Analysis 1.1—Pain at rest at 24 hours Overall ‐0.72 19 60
1. FNB vs PCA opioid Analysis 1.2—Pain at rest at 24 hours by allocation concealment Low risk of bias RCTs ‐0.54 9 18
1. FNB vs PCA Opioid Analysis 1.5—Pain on movement at 24 hours Overall ‐0.94 17 78
1. FNB vs PCA opioid Analysis 1.6—Pain on movement at 24 hours by allocation concealment Low risk of bias RCTs ‐0.54 9 18
2. FNB vs epidural Analysis 2.1—Pain at Rrest at 24 hours < not significant, not applicable >
2. FNB vs epidural Analysis 2.5—Pain on movement at 24 hours < not significant, not applicable >
3. FNB vs local infiltration Analysis 2.1—Pain at rest at 24 hours < not significant, not applicable >
3. FNB vs local infiltration Analysis 2.5—Pain on movement at 24 hours < not significant, not applicable >
4. Continuous vs single‐shot FNB Analysis 4.1—Pain at rest at 24 hours Overall ‐0.62 4 9
4. Continuous vs single‐shot FNB Analysis 4.3—Pain on movement at 24 hours Overall ‐0.42 4 5