Sharma 2009.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Cross‐sectional cohort (only screening cohort); prospective single‐centre study. | ||
Patient characteristics and setting |
Participants: 34 participants with end‐stage liver disease. Baseline diagnosis: not reported. Disease severity: not reported. Co‐morbidity: not reported. Geographical location of the study: not reported. Inclusion criteria: not reported. Exclusion criteria: not reported. |
||
Index tests |
Index test: oesophageal capsule endoscopy without any further specification. Criteria for oesophageal varices: not reported. Operator: performed by ESO‐trained gastroenterologists. |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Target condition: presence of any and large oesophageal varices. Reference standard: oesophago‐gastro‐duodenoscopy. Criteria for oesophageal varices: not reported. Prevalence of the target condition: 82% (28/34 participants). |
||
Flow and timing | |||
Comparative | |||
Notes |
Observer variation: no data on observer variation were reported. Uninterpretable results: data on uninterpretable results were not reported. Side effects or complications: no side effects or complications with ESO were described. 4 minor events with oesophago‐gastro‐duodenoscopy (hypotension, hypoxia, and possible aspiration). Type of publication: abstract. |
||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Yes | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
Did the study enrol only patients with suspected oesophageal varices not until diagnosed? | Yes | ||
Low | High | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Low |