Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul 19;2004(3):CD003445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003445.pub2

Cascinu 1995.

Methods RCT: To assess the antitumour effect of octreotide vs. BSC in patients with advanced GI cancer refractory to chemotherapy
Duration: Patients in both arms followed until death 
 Jan 1990 to Dec 1992 (study recruitment period)
Patients in both arms could receive supportive care.
Journal: British Journal of Cancer 1995.
Participants Participants: Advanced GI cancer patients refractory to chemotherapy
Primary tumours were: 
 stomach (n = 29) 
 pancreas (n = 32) 
 colon‐rectum (n = 46)
Median Age (years and range): 
 Octreotide: 68 (39 to 71) 
 Controls (BSC): 66 (44 to 72)
Gender: 
 Male/Female ratio 
 Octreotide: 35/20 
 Controls (BSC): 30/22.
Performance Status: 
 ECOG PS 0‐2.
Interventions Total n = 107
T1: Octreotide (n = 55) (200 micrograms three times/day for five days a week (primary tumours were stomach (15), pancreas (16) and colon‐rectum 
 (24) 
 versus 
 T2: Controls (BSC) (n = 52) (primary tumours were stomach (14), pancreas (16) and colon‐rectum (22)
Outcomes Survival length (primary outcome variable). Outcome variable of secondary importance was response rate. Duration of survival : T1: Significant advantage in duration of survival, median survival time 
 T1: 20 weeks versus T2: 11 weeks ( P < 0.0001) This advantage was also present considering the survival data for each tumour group
Subgroup analysis: Stomach: survival curves comparing patients with stomach cancer treated with T1 (n = 15) or not (n = 14). There was a statistical difference between 2 curves: Mantel‐Cox (log‐rank), P = 0.003
Colon rectum 
 Survival curves comparing patients with colorectal cancer treated with T1 (n = 24) or not (n = 22). There was a statistical difference between the two arms. Mantel‐Cox (log‐rank), P = 0.001.
This trial had no specific quality of life data.
Notes Authors conclusions: Octreotide therapy: seems to confer a survival benefit in advanced GI cancer patients refractory to chemotherapy. Although results are encouraging authors think that additional studies will be needed to confirm these results and to clarify other questions about dose and schedule of octreotide and the impact of octreotide treatment in terms of not only survival but also patients quality of life
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate