Comparison 5. Double gloves versus indicator glove ‐ outermost.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Number of perforations in outermost gloves | 2 | 396 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.46 [0.69, 3.08] |