Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Comparison 11. Double gloves versus triple gloves ‐ innermost.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of perforations to innermost gloves 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 69.41 [3.89, 1239.18]