Comparison 11. Double gloves versus triple gloves ‐ innermost.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Number of perforations to innermost gloves | 1 | 60 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 69.41 [3.89, 1239.18] |