Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Caillot 1999.

Methods Surgical procedures randomised to one of two groups. Randomisation and concealment details not given
Participants Principal surgeon and assistant. General surgery. Sample size of 80 procedures.
Interventions Single versus standard double gloving.
Outcomes Glove perforation, porosity or gown wetting.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear