Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Duron 1996.

Methods Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Details of method of randomisation and concealment are not given. Perforation test ‐ gloves placed in labelled bag, tested in a laboratory by filling with water, cuff tied and palm and digit expressed to identify leaks of water.
Participants Surgeons and scrub nurses. central venous cannulation and insertion of implantable catheters with ports. 92 double outer gloves and 108 indicator outer gloves were collected.
Interventions Standard double versus indicator system
Outcomes Number of perforations. Proportion of total number of perforations detected by glove wearer during surgery.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear