Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Kovavisarach 1998.

Methods Residents randomised to one of two groups using sealed envelopes. Details of method of randomisation not given. Perforations tested by filling glove with 1.5‐2 times its normal capacity and immersing in water. Air bubbles indicated perforation
Participants Residents. Obstetric surgery ‐ perineorrhaphy. 742 single gloves and 658 double outer gloves were collected.
Interventions Single versus standard double gloves
Outcomes Number of perforations.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate