Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Kovavisarach 2002.

Methods Surgeons were randomised to one of two groups. Randomisation and allocation concealment details not given. Testers were unaware of glove group status. Glove filled with air and submerged in water.
Participants Primary surgeons. Abdominal hysterectomy. Sample size ‐ 170 patients.
Interventions Single versus standard double gloving.
Outcomes Number of perforations.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear