Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Rudiman 1999.

Methods Patient randomised by hospital number. Details of glove tester not given. Glove filled with unspecified amount of water and squeezed.
Participants Primary and assistant surgeon. General surgery. sample ‐ 60 patients.
Interventions Single versus standard double gloving.
Outcomes Number of perforations.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? High risk C ‐ Inadequate