Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2

Thomas 2001.

Methods Surgeons were randomised into two groups using sealed envelopes immediately prior to scrubbing. Details of method of randomisation not given. Perforations were tested by 2 methods: filling the gloves with air and submerging them in water and filling the gloves with water and observing for leaks.
Participants Primary surgeon and assistant surgeon. General surgery
Interventions Single versus standard double gloves
Outcomes Number of perforations.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate