Wilson 1996.

Methods	Surgeons were randomised to 1 of 4 gloving groups. Randomisation was achieved through taking a card out of an envelope with numbers 1‐4 printed on it. No details regarding the method used to detect perforations are given.
Participants	Surgeons only.
Interventions	Single gloves versus 3 standard double gloving combinations. Group 1‐ normal size inside with half size larger outside. Group 2 ‐ normal size outside with half size larger inside. Group 3 two pairs of normal size.
Outcomes	Subjective effects ‐ comfort, sensitivity and dexterity. Perforations
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Allocation concealment?	High risk	C ‐ Inadequate