Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003681.pub3

Zollweg 1997.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. Randomised using a random numbers table 
 Blinding: investigators and outcomes assessors blinded 
 Duration: 9 months
Participants Diagnosis: cognitive impairment including autism spectrum disorder. Age: 7‐24 years 
 n=30
Interventions 1. AIT 2 30 min sessions for 10 consecutive days
2. Control: as above but music unmodified
Outcomes Standardised tests of behaviour, sound sensitivity, measurement of pure tone thresholds
Notes 28 analysed for ABC at 9mths 
 22 analysed for loudness discomfort 
 14 analysed for pure tone thresholds
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Inadequate, following communication with study author (Zollweg 2002 (pers comm))
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 2 patients lost to follow‐up (1 from each group) prior to completion of study. There were fewer participants for audiological and sound sensitivity data due to illness or poor cooperation
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The outcomes listed in the methods are reported in the results
Other bias Unclear risk Treatment group included 9 cognitively impaired and 6 autistic patients, control group included 12 cognitively impaired and 3 autistic patients. Correspondence with author confirmed that all participants had been diagnosed with autism
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Investigators blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes assessors blinded