Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD003439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003439.pub2

While 1996.

Methods Cohort study 
 Baseline survey: June 1993 (phase 3 of ongoing cohort study) 
 Follow‐up: One year (1994, phase IV) 
 Site: England 
 Research question: Is there a relationship between uptake of smoking and awareness of most and least advertised brands? 
 Analysis: Odds ratios and CIs for likelihood of uptake using least advertised brands as the base, no adjustment was made for any potential confounders
Participants 814 boys & 676 girls (age 11‐12) from 31 schools present at baseline and follow‐up. 40 questionnaires (2.7%) omitted as incomplete. 
 Main analysis on 136 boys and 134 girls who became smokers during period 
 Survey method: Self‐administered in the classroom, returned in sealed envelopes.
Interventions Awareness of advertising measured. Cigarette brand awareness measured using same questions as Charlton 1989 Smokers were asked which brand they smoked and why.
Outcomes Smoking defined as ever trying a cigarette
Notes Benson & Hedges and Silk Cut were most advertised brands during the period. Embassy heavily advertised in period before first survey.

Interventions column gives details of the measurement of exposure/ attitudes to advertising