While 1996.
Methods | Cohort study Baseline survey: June 1993 (phase 3 of ongoing cohort study) Follow‐up: One year (1994, phase IV) Site: England Research question: Is there a relationship between uptake of smoking and awareness of most and least advertised brands? Analysis: Odds ratios and CIs for likelihood of uptake using least advertised brands as the base, no adjustment was made for any potential confounders | |
Participants | 814 boys & 676 girls (age 11‐12) from 31 schools present at baseline and follow‐up. 40 questionnaires (2.7%) omitted as incomplete. Main analysis on 136 boys and 134 girls who became smokers during period Survey method: Self‐administered in the classroom, returned in sealed envelopes. | |
Interventions | Awareness of advertising measured. Cigarette brand awareness measured using same questions as Charlton 1989 Smokers were asked which brand they smoked and why. | |
Outcomes | Smoking defined as ever trying a cigarette | |
Notes | Benson & Hedges and Silk Cut were most advertised brands during the period. Embassy heavily advertised in period before first survey. |
Interventions column gives details of the measurement of exposure/ attitudes to advertising