Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD003439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003439.pub2

Armstrong 1990.

Methods Cohort study (reported as part of an RCT of a school based prevention programme) 
 Baseline survey: June 1981 
 Follow‐up: 17 months (1982) and 30 months (1983) 
 Site: Western Australia 
 Research question: Primary question was to evaluate an educational programme, secondary aim to relate uptake of smoking to baseline factors including perceived influence of advertising 
 Analysis: Logistic regression, separately for boys and girls. Prevention programme variable forced into model as first step. Additive risk model used to estimate parameters adjusted for other covariates measured at baseline
Participants 2366 children from 45 schools, 82% followed up at 17 months and 64% at 30 months 
 Year 7 at baseline, between 11 and 14, modal age 12 
 Survey method: Questionnaire administered in classrooms. Students shown a film demonstrating how smoking could be detected from saliva analysis and samples collected but not all analysed. Smoking behaviour based on self‐report.
Interventions Influence of advertising measured by 1 question: How much do cigarette advertisements make you think you would like to smoke a cigarette? Responses dichotomised as none at all/ some influence. 
 Baseline information on habits of parents, siblings and friends, knowledge of and attitudes to smoking also collected.
Outcomes Smoking defined as even just a few puffs in past 12 months. Analysis uses only baseline nonsmokers
Notes