Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;6(1):e000699. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000699

Table 5.

Contingency table of frequencies and percentages of agreement between raters A and B for the ultrasound-based diagnosis of tendinopathy using standardised criteria

Rater A: n (%) Rater B: n (%)
Normal R/ED LD/D Total (%) Po (95% CI)
Round 1
 Normal 6 (19.4) 2 (6.5) 0 (0.0) 8 (25.8) 0.60 (0.27 to 0.86)
 R/ED 2 (6.5) 11 (35.5) 4 (12.9) 17 (54.8) 0.57 (0.33 to 0.78)
 LD/D 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 6 (19.4) 6 (19.4) 0.60 (0.27 to 0.86)
 Total 8 (25.8) 13 (41.9) 10 (32.3) 31 (100.0) 0.74 (0.55 to 0.87)
Round 2
 Normal 3 (9.7) 2 (6.5) 0 (0.0) 5 (16.1) 0.60 (0.17 to 0.92)
 R/ED 0 (0.0) 18 (58.1) 1 (3.2) 19 (61.3) 0.81 (0.58 to 0.94)
 LD/D 0 (0.0) 1 (3.2) 6 (19.4) 7 (22.6) 0.75 (0.35 to 0.95)
 Total 3 (9.7) 21 (67.7) 7 (22.6) 31 (100.0) 0.87 (0.69 to 0.95)

LD/D, late dysrepair/degenerative; Po, observed proportion of agreement; R/ED, reactive/early dysrepair.