Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;16(2):277–284. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.2.277

Table 2. Parameters for caloric tests and vHITs according to the subgroup and lesion location.

Peripheral lesions Central lesions p
Abnormal caloric test group (n=123)
 Prevalence 105 (85.4) 18 (14.6) <0.001
  Unilateral caloric paresis subgroup
   Prevalence 101 (85.6) 17 (14.4) <0.001
   Caloric paresis, % 49.7±21.0 48.8±21.9 0.788
43 (33–61) 42 (29–63)
   vHIT gain for the ear with caloric paresis 1.00±0.08 0.94±0.08 0.004
1.03 (0.95–1.07) 0.91 (0.89–1.02)
   vHIT gain for the healthy ear in the caloric test 1.03±0.06 1.03±0.06 0.687
1.05 (1.00–1.07) 1.04 (1.01–1.07)
   AI of vHIT gain, % 3.0±3.3 5.3±3.6 0.007
2 (1–4.5) 6 (2–7.5)
Abnormal horizontal vHIT group (n=39)
 Prevalence 20 (54.1) 19 (45.9) 0.001
  Bilaterally positive vHIT group
   Prevalence 9 (50.0) 9 (50.0) 0.001
   Caloric paresis, % 9.9±6.0 7.7±4.5 0.489
9 (4–15.5) 8 (3–11.5)
   vHIT gain for both ears 0.69±0.08 0.63±0.10 0.101
0.72 (0.63–0.75) 0.66 (0.62–0.70)
   AI of vHIT gain, % 4.4±2.30 6.1±6.30 0.489
4.0 (3–5) 3 (2–13)
 Unilaterally positive vHIT group
   Prevalence 11 (57.9) 8 (42.1) 0.491
   Caloric paresis, % 9.6±8.2 11.4±7.7 0.840
8 (2–18) (5–19)
   vHIT gain for weak ear 0.62±0.18 0.69±0.09 0.492
0.69 (0.56–0.73) 0.71 (0.60–0.78)
   vHIT gain for healthy ear 0.97±0.11 0.92±0.10 0.206
0.93 (0.89–1.07) 0.87 (0.84–1.03)
   AI of vHIT gain, % 23.3±20.2 14.0±7.2 0.395
14 (9–28.0) 15 (8–19.5)

Data are mean±standard deviation and median (interquartile range) or n (%) values. Statistical analysis was not performed for subgroups with bilateral caloric paresis and hyperactive vHIT due to the small number of patients (<5).

AI: asymmetry index, vHIT: video head impulse test.