Table 8.

Bonferroni multiple comparisons post hoc test for the different cardiac SW utilized by study participants

Factor		LVEF post stress (%)			LVEF rest (%)
Software (I)	Software (J)	Mean Difference (I–J)	SE	P value	Mean difference (I–J)	SE	P value
4DMCardio	CedarsSinai	− 0.017	1.059	1.000	0.350	0.972	1.000
	EmoryCardiacToolBox	− 8.266	1.560	< 0.001	− 8.244	1.555	< 0.001
	Interview	− 3.540	1.793	0.489	− 3.497	1.646	0.342
	Other	2.532	3.474	1.000	1.858	3.189	1.000
CedarsSinai	4DMCardio	0.017	1.059	1.000	− 0.350	0.972	1.000
	EmoryCardiacToolBox	− 8.248	1.399	< 0.001	− 8.594	1.420	< 0.001
	Interview	− 3.523	1.654	0.338	− 3.847	1.519	0.117
	Other	2.549	3.405	1.000	1.508	3.126	1.000
EmoryCardiacToolBox	4DMCardio	8.266	1.560	< 0.001	8.244	1.555	< 0.001
	CedarsSinai	8.248	1.399	< 0.001	8.594	1.420	< 0.001
	Interview	4.725	2.013	0.193	4.747	1.944	0.150
	Other	10.798	3.593	< 0.001	10.102	3.353	< 0.001
Interview	4DMCardio	3.540	1.793	0.489	3.497	1.646	0.342
	CedarsSinai	3.523	1.654	0.338	3.847	1.519	0.117
	EmoryCardiacToolBox	− 4.725	2.013	0.193	− 4.747	1.944	0.150
	Other	6.072	3.700	1.000	5.355	3.396	1.000
Other	4DMCardio	− 2.532	3.474	1.000	− 1.858	3.189	1.000
	CedarsSinai	− 2.549	3.405	1.000	− 1.508	3.126	1.000
	EmoryCardiacToolBox	− 10.798	3.593	< 0.001	− 10.102	3.353	< 0.001
	Interview	− 6.072	3.700	1.000	− 5.355	3.396	1.000

Highly significant P values are given in bold