Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;36(5):921–928. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01785-w

Table 3.

Inter-technique agreements for left atrial volumes and ejection fraction between CMR short-axis and biplane methods

Parameter CMR SAX mean ± SD CMR biplane Mean ± SD Mean dfference ± SD 95% Limits of agreement P value
All patients (n = 97)
 LAV max (ml) 120 ± 50 102 ± 44 18 ± 21 − 22 to 60 < 0.0001
 LAV min (ml) 84 ± 49 71 ± 44 13 ± 18 − 22 to 48 < 0.0001
 LAEF (%) 34 ± 13 34 ± 16 − 1 ± 8 − 17 to 15 0.307
Sinus rhythm (n = 74)
 LAV max (ml) 103 ± 33 88 ± 32 15 ± 13 − 9 to 41 < 0.0001
 LAV min (ml) 64 ± 26 53 ± 25 11 ± 10 − 9 to 31 < 0.0001
 LAEF (%) 39 ± 10 41 ± 12 − 2 ± 9 − 20 to 16 0.083
Atrial fibrillation (n = 23)
 LAV max (ml) 176 ± 56 147 ± 45 27 ± 35 − 42 to 97 0.001
 LAV min (ml) 148 ± 51 129 ± 43 19 ± 32 − 43 to 81 0.008
 LAEF (%) 16 ± 8 14 ± 9 2 ± 4 − 6 to 10 0.013

Abbreviations are as for Table 2