TABLE 1.
Overview of study characteristics of this clinical study and previous research investigating the effect of VNS on memory performance.
| This study | Clark et al. (1999) | Jacobs et al. (2015) | |
| Study design | Within-subjects | Within-subjects | Within-subjects |
| Study population | Healthy volunteers | Epilepsy patients | Healthy older volunteers |
| young age group | |||
| old age group | |||
| Sample size | 65 | 10 | 30 |
| 41 young age group | |||
| 24 old age group | |||
| Memory function | Immediate recall | Immediate recall Delayed recognition | Name–face association |
| Delayed recognition | Delayed recognition | ||
| Device | tVNS (NEMOS) | Invasive VNS | tVNS (TENStem) |
| Stimulation parameters | |||
| Output current | According to threshold | 0.5–1.5 mA | 5 mA |
| Frequency | 25 Hz | 30 Hz | 8 Hz |
| Pulse width | 250 μs | 500 μs | 200 μs |
| Duration | 30 s | 30 s | 17 min |
| Washout period | 30 min | unknown | >7 days |
| Number of conditions | 3 (tVNS, sham, control) | 2 (VNS, sham) | 2 (tVNS, sham) |