TABLE 2.
Determination of the correlations between deformability and aggregation parameters of red blood cells from neuroacanthocytosis patients.
| r | R2 | P (two-tailed) | N | |
| EIimax vs. SS1/2 | –0.5878 | 0.3455 | 0.0444 | 12 |
| AI vs. t1/2 | –0.9539 | 0.9099 | <0.0001 | 10 |
| EImax vs. AI | 0.1266 | 0.01603 | 0.7274 | 10 |
| EImax vs. AMP | 0.3614 | 0.1306 | 0.3048 | 10 |
| EImax vs. t1/2 | –0.03048 | 0.0009291 | 0.9334 | 10 |
| SS1/2 vs. AI | –0.4562 | 0.2081 | 0.1851 | 10 |
| SS1/2 vs. AMP | –0.222 | 0.04928 | 0.5376 | 10 |
| SS1/2 vs. t1/2 | 0.4941 | 0.2442 | 0.1466 | 10 |
| Tr vs. EImax | 0.6559 | 0.4302 | 0.0395 | 10 |
| Tr vs. AI | 0.5728 | 0.3281 | 0.0835 | 10 |
| Tr vs. AMP | 0.8512 | 0.7246 | 0.0018 | 10 |
| Tr vs. t1/2 | –0.4576 | 0.2094 | 0.1836 | 10 |
| Tr vs. SS1/2 | –0.4139 | 0.1713 | 0.2344 | 10 |
| Ratio [SS1/2/EImax] vs. AI | –0.3864 | 0.1493 | 0.27 | 10 |
| Ratio vs. AMP | –0.2781 | 0.07733 | 0.4366 | 10 |
| Ratio vs. t1/2 | 0.3596 | 0.1293 | 0.3074 | 10 |
| Ratio vs. Tr | –0.5511 | 0.3037 | 0.0987 | 10 |
| Ratio vs. EImax | –0.8103 | 0.6566 | 0.0014 | 12 |
| Ratio vs. SS1/2 | 0.9449 | 0.8928 | <0.0001 | 12 |
Deformability and aggregation characteristics of the red blood cells from neuroacanthocytosis patients were determined and analyzed as described in the legend to Table 1.