Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 12;2020:4874876. doi: 10.1155/2020/4874876

Table 2.

Thickness of mean RNFL and mean RNFL thinning compared with baseline μ¯m.

Time Mild (3.62 ± 1.41 dB) Moderate (8.59 ± 1.79 dB) Severe (18.16 ± 3.57 dB)
A Baseline 84.5871 68.0094 48.4642
At 3 months 84.2700 67.7853 48.4218
At 6 months 84.1038 67.6359 48.4311
At 9 months 83.8976 67.4412 48.4247
At 12 months 83.6119 66.9924 48.3190
At 15 months 83.2138 66.7906 48.3121
At 18 months 82.9848 66.5888 48.1595
R Avalue 2 0.988 0.982 0.814
F A(P) 418.279 (p < 0.05) 276.064 (p < 0.05) 21.884 (p < 0.05)

B At 3 months 0.3171 0.2241 0.0424
At 6 months 0.4833 0.3735 0.0331
At 9 months 0.6895 0.5682 0.0395
At 12 months 0.9752 1.0170 0.1452
At 15 months 1.3733 1.2188 0.1521
At 18 months 1.6023 1.4206 0.3047
R Bvalue 2 0.982 0.978 0.805
F B(P) 219.026 (p < 0.05) 175.948 (p < 0.05) 16.558 (p < 0.05)

A: mean RNFL thickness for each group; RAvalue2: use simple linear regression analysis to get the coefficient determination of each group; FA: use analysis of variance to prove the linear relationship between RNFL thickness and time. B: mean RNFL thinning thickness compared with baseline for each group; RBvalue2: use simple linear regression analysis to get the coefficient determination of each group; FB: use analysis of variance to prove the linear relationship between RNFL thinning thickness and time.