Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;9(3):121. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9030121

Table 4.

Cure rates accordingly to previous therapeutic failures.

No. of Failures Therapy No. PP 95% CI ITT 95% CI
1 (415 pts) Sequential 67 98.4 91.5–99.7 92.5 83.7–96.8
Levofloxacin-based 221 88.5 83.2−92.2 79.7 73.8–84.4
Rifabutin-based 109 89.0 81.0–93.9 74.3 65.4–81.6
Pylera® 18 94.1 73.0–99.0 88.9 67.2–96.9
2 (310 pts) Sequential 29 84.5 * 71.0–96.0 79.3 71.6–91.1
Levofloxacin-based 132 88.1 81.3–92.6 84.1 76.9–89.3
Rifabutin-based 129 82.2 74.3–88.0 75.2 67.1–81.8
Pylera® 20 94.7 75.3–99.1 90.0 69.9–97.2
≥3 (312 pts) Sequential 18 81.2 57.0–93.4 72.2 49.1–87.5
Levofloxacin-based 63 77.1 65.1–85.8 74.6 72.7–83.7
Rifabutin-based 216 82.2 76.3–86.8 76.9 70.8–82.0
Pylera® 15 80.0 * 54.8–92.9 80.0 54.8–92.9

* Sequential therapy had a statistically significant (P < 0.05) decrease in eradication rates if used as third line therapy. Pylera® had a statistically significant decrease in eradication rates if used as fourth line therapy. Pts: patients. PP: per protocol analysis. ITT: intention to treat analysis.