Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;118(8):1901–1913. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.02.024

Table 4.

Summary of Experimental and Simulation Findings for Each Peptide

Peptide Experiment Simulation
Melittin Transient pores at high peptide concentration (e.g., P:L ≥ 1:50) (18,20) Very small and unstable pore with four peptides. Two peptides leave the pore.
MelP5 Active at lower peptide concentrations than melittin (e.g., P:L = 1:500) (20). Requires higher peptide concentrations than pHD15 at low pH and mac70 (22). Small but stable pore
pHD15, pH 7 Peptide is random coil and does not bind the membrane (21,24). Helices unfold and come to the surface. Water pore seems unstable.
pHD15, pH 5 Potent pore former at very low peptide concentrations (21) A large pore forms when Ct is protonated as well as Glu, Asp, and His residues.
mac70, neutral and low pH Potent pore former at low peptide concentrations (22) Large pores at neutral pH and low pH where Glu residues and Ct are protonated
MelP5_Δ6 Designed to be active at low pH, but needs high concentrations of peptide and only makes small pores (23) Small, defect-like pore at low pH