Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;59(8):5564–5578. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00263

Table 1. Cyclic Voltammetry of [Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl] and Related DHBPY Complexes.

complex solvent cathodic wave Ep,c (V vs Fc/Fc+)
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl] THF R1 –1.01
    –1.40a
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl]   R1* –1.90a,b
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl]•–   R2 –2.38
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY-H+)(CO)3Cl]   R2′ –2.38
  –2.30a
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY-H+)(CO)3Cl]c   R2* –2.16
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl] [Re(3,3′-DHBPY-H+)(CO)3Cl] PrCN R1 –0.84
    –1.22a
    R2′ –2.30
      –2.25a
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3(PrCN)]+ PrCN R1 –0.93
[Re(3,3′-DHBPY-H+)(CO)3(PrCN)]   R2′ –2.07
[Re(4,4′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl]d,e DMF R1 –1.98
[Re(4,4′-DHBPY-H+)(CO)3Cl]   R2 –2.18
[Re(4,4′-DHBPY-2H+)(CO)3]   R3 –2.45
a

Measured at 195 K.

b

No concomitant reductive deprotonation of the 3,3′-DHBPY ligand taking place. E1/2= −1.87 V.

c

Prepared by chemical deprotonation of [Re(3,3′-DHBPY)(CO)3Cl] with 1 equiv of NaHMDS.

d

Measured by Fujita and co-workers.46

e

No deprotonation of the parent complex in DMF was reported