Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;17:124. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01813-5

Table 3.

Associations between plasma biomarkers and neuroimaging indicators

Fazekas score (n = 57) Lacunes (n = 57) CMBs (n = 47)
NfL ρ (95% CI)* 0.02 (− 0.26, 0.29) 0.09 (− 0.19, 0.36) 0.32 (0.03, 0.56)
β (95% CI) 0.03 (− 0.14, 0.19) 0.09 (− 0.17, 0.35) 0.16 (0.02, 0.30)
GFAP ρ (95% CI)* 0.23 (− 0.05, 0.47) − 0.07 (− 0.34, 0.21) 0.37 (0.08, 0.60)
β (95% CI) 0.05 (− 0.13, 0.23) − 0.03 (− 0.31, 0.25) 0.15 (− 0.02, 0.33)
Tau ρ (95% CI)* − 0.08 (− 0.35, 0.20) 0.08 (− 0.20, 0.34) 0.08 (− 0.23, 0.36)
β (95% CI) − 0.01 (− 0.19, 0.18) 0.07 (− 0.21, 0.35) 0.08 (− 0.08, 0.24)
UCHL1 ρ (95% CI)* 0.01 (− 0.27, 0.29) − 0.13 (− 0.39, 0.16) 0.08 (− 0.23, 0.36)
β (95% CI) 0.02 (− 0.15, 0.20) − 0.13 (− 0.41, 0.14) 0.06 (− 0.10, 0.21)

Numbers in bold indicate statistical significance

CMBs cerebral microbleeds, GFAP glial fibrillary acidic protein, NfL neurofilament light chain, UCHL1 ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1

*Spearman’s rank correlation partially adjusted for age and sex. Multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and hypertension